Tuesday, November 24, 2009

neurotic

I'm isolated.
Stuck in a hazy mist.
Angsty and neurotic.
Dull stabbing pain.
Nauseous and nervous.
Why can't it cease.
Taken a blunt cordless drill to my head.
Lobotomized.
Smoked up and blown out.
Wash it down by chasing the dragon.
Pin cushion.
Black Russian's.
Red Russian's.
Socialism.
Communism.
Anti-capital.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Story of the Candy Cane

There was a man who loved Jesus so much that he decided to do something special for Jesus' birthday. Since he was a candy maker, he wanted to use his talents to make a special candy to honour Jesus, so he designed the first candy cane.

If the candy cane is held upright, it is the shape of the shepherd's staff, which the shepherd uses as he watches over his sheep and is the symbol of Christian service and care. Jesus is our shepherd. If the candy cane is turned upside down, it becomes the letter "J" for Jesus. He is the joy of living.

The Scriptures tell us that by Jesus' stripes, we are healed. Jesus was beaten and stripes were put upon his back when he was crucified in payment for our sins. So the candy cane was made with red and white stripes to represent the blood of Jesus, which washes away our sins and makes us pure and white as snow.

One bold stripe represents out belief in the one God, who is Father of us all. The three fine stripes represent the Trinity - one God who has revealed Himself to using the three ways - the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

The candy cane is breakable that it may be shared. Receive it as a gift, Jesus Christ the Lord is a wonderful gift of God's love to us all.

Taken from "Parish Talk" the quaterly magazine for Wodonga Catholic Parish.
Submitted by parishioner, Nancy Tanner.

Monday, November 16, 2009

Sozialismus!!!

It's not hard to see WHY the vast majority of the Western World are against the political ideology of Socialism and Communism - one only had to look at the past to see the terrors of the world committed by Communist and Socialist governments, from the National Socialist "Third Reich" to the Communist Stalinist period in Soviet Russia.

Still people refuse to look at certain communities that were Socialist or Communist in the past and got on just fine! Sure, they were not Marxist because this was before Marx, Engels and "The Communist Manifesto", but it is all still the same. Three I can pick from the top of my head - and all three are also deeply religious communities also, so keep this in mind if you are religious and feel that ALL Communist and Socialist way of life is anti-God.

Number one starts when Christianity started - the time of the Apostles - who lived in a fairly Communist way. Same as the early Latter-Day Saints and even up to this current period in time, there are many other communes in the world which are some of the best places to live for many people in the world. There are the Amish, there are also small communes that not many people know about that exist even in Australia, such as "Fairy Land", in New South Wales near Nimbin.

The Western World was going through the biggest change in history since the Protestant Reformation at the time of Marx, Engels and "The Communist Manifesto". Roughly one-hundred years before "The Manifesto" was published, the French Revolution occured, with The People overthrowing the Monarchy and eventually, after much bloodshed, wars and evil leaders, abolished the absolute monarchy and aristocracy, replacing it with a republic system.

Towards the start of the 20th century, not long after "The Manifesto" was published and distributed throughout Europe, the world was going to see the two largest wars in history. Countries such as Germany were in great depression and in need of a great leader - or a saviour, as they saw him - such as Adolf Hitler. Life was great for many German's, except the minorities, in pre-war Nazi Germany.

In Russia, the exiled-lawyer, Vladimir Lenin, returned and just as the French had done some one-hundred years earlier, the Russian aristocracy and monarchy was overthrown. The Kremlin, one the house of the Czar, became the Russian "White House" and still is to this day.

Here's an interesting little fact for you... the first country in the world to lift the ban on homosexuality was indeed the Soviet Union! Strange you may say because Stalin was such an iron-fisted ruler with very little tolerance, however this took place before Stalin became the leader, after the death of Lenin. What would the world be like had Stalin not taken his place, but Trotsky instead? Would the world have seen Communism and Socialism in a different light? Maybe, maybe not.

The thing to remember here is that the world was in chaos at that time, the countries who adopted the new practice of Communism and Socialism had a radical change in a short span of time. The leaders had to protect the country from invasion and economic hardship, so it's not hard to see why the leaders were Hitler's and Stalin's.

In the Western World, many people still haven't gotten past the thought and conviction that Communism and Socialism are bad ideologies that don't work because they only look to the period of time which was in utter chaos! Today there still remains many old slogans that were in use by the Western Democracies during the 1950's such as "Better to be dead than a Red" and others.

Many religious people see it as nothing more than replacing God with ones-self. I get many emails from fellow Catholic's telling me how evil Communism is for instance, with a link to a video on Communism by famous people in historical media such as Bishop Fulton Sheen et cetera.

The truth is, take a look at the world of today - it is just as evil. We all suffer because of the Western Democracy! The poorest countries are suffering because of global warming, which they didn't contribute much at all to creating this problem! People are starving and living on the streets because of the increase in EVERYTHING all because of what? The economic crisis of Wall Street in the Great Depression, also in the recent recession of 2009! Why do the poor have to suffer because of the greed of the big fat-cat capitalists? They lose millions, sure, but at the end of the day they sit down in their mansions, eating lobster and turkey for dinner, crying poor because they're no longer multi-billionaires, but simply "mere" millionaires... at the same time, the poor and the working class have to go without many of their basic needs because of the price hike in everything.

When will people see through the evils of capitalism? When will people start looking towards alternative political systems that are there for humanity? For women, for gays and other minorities, for the environment. The answer is - they won't! Why? Because the world has been brainwashed into loving the capitalist system, even the poorest of the poor, because everyone has the hope and dream that one day they will have money - the house, the sports car and the 2.5 kids who they will privately educate.

Communism and Socialism may have been evil in the past - but they were also good in the past in certain instances. What of capitalist society? They have been evil too! They just hide things with their propaganda and blame someone else.

CAPITALISM SUCKS!!!

And yes, I will still stand by this thought, even when I have heaps of money one day. I will never be one of those capitalists who puts all their money into the air on things such as the stock market and other ways of getting "fast cash". To hell with it! You need to understand those things properly in order to gain money, and even if you do understand it, you end up losing out because the fat cats at the top just take it all.

If a quater of the people in the country decided "to hell with the banks et cetera" and went in to close their accounts and withdraw their cash to put in a safe, imagine the chaos, simply because the money is simply a figure, not real. They would be able to give the first people in their money, but after a while, it all dries out, then what? Go print more money at the mint? No. Simply create a new law saying people must have bank accounts with savings in there. The chaos would then be blamed on the Communists and Socialists of the world, and the majority once again see this not as a personal attack on an innocent system, but simply as an evil political ideology that should have been banned with the dissolution of the U.S.S.R.

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Bushfires


Hear our urgent prayer, O God, as we strive to quench the bushfires raging around us. Sustain our fighting spirits, keep us from harm, and bless our toil with success. We ask this through Christ our Lord. Amen.

Monday, November 2, 2009

Drunks dodge driving bullet using blood alcohol, drugs loophole


Anthony Dowsley
Herald Sun November 02, 2009 12:00AM



KILLER drivers could dodge some of our toughest road laws because of a loophole affecting blood alcohol and drug testing.
Concerns are held that a ruling in a culpable driving court case may open the way for all drivers to contest blood samples recording alcohol and drug content.
A judge hearing the case against Mark Shannon, who was at the wheel of a car in which Samantha Saul, a woman he had just met, was killed, disallowed a blood reading because Shannon claimed he had not received a blood sample.
The County Court heard Shannon was recorded with a .119 reading, more than twice the legal limit, and was travelling at more than twice the speed limit when he was T-boned by another car as he drove through a red light at the city intersection of King and Flinders streets in August 2005.
The decision has outraged the victim's family and police are worried it has implications for all future culpable driving cases.
Shannon, 30, who pleaded guilty to the lesser charges of dangerous driving causing death and two counts of negligently causing serious injury was last Thursday jailed by Judge Stuart Campbell for a minimum of two years.
But during legal argument in September, Judge Campbell accepted it would not be fair to Shannon if he did not have a sample of blood he could have independently analysed.
Argument was heard on whether the Royal Melbourne Hospital doctor who took the blood samples complied with all regulations in taking and distributing the samples. Three blood samples were taken, one of which the doctor testified was put with Shannon's belongings as required by the Road Safety Act 1986, while another two were given to police to test.
Although Judge Campbell said he was satisfied the doctor had complied with the legislation, defence lawyer Brendan Murphy, QC, had evidence of the blood samples disallowed after sworn evidence from Shannon, his father and his girlfriend that he did not receive his sample, which was allegedly left at the foot of his hospital bed.
The prosecution subsequently dropped a culpable driving causing death charge because of the ruling.
Dangerous driving causing death at the time of the incident had a maximum penalty of five years' jail, much less than the 20 years available in culpable driving cases.
Ms Saul's mother, Barbara, wrote to Attorney-General Rob Hulls for support, but said her pleas were ignored.
"This is about rotten legislation," Ms Saul said. "If he can't help, who can? It's a precedent for every drink driver to have it (blood readings) thrown out. It's ludicrous".
Police sources have told the Herald Sun they are worried all culpable driving cases in which blood samples are taken could be in jeopardy.
"It's a ruling that has the potential to impact upon every blood alcohol content case," a police source said. "Every case we have involving drug and alcohol which we take blood for is in peril."
Inspector Martin Boorman of the traffic, drugs and alcohol section said other court rulings would be monitored.
"By its very nature it is of concern," he said. "I'm not sure that it is going to apply in all cases because it is based on one judge's decision."
Insp Boorman said the issue would be raised in reviews of laws about blood alcohol concentration.
Mr Murphy said later the ruling would be persuasive only in similar cases. "The judge was not satisfied the accused got his sample," he said. "Procedures were not followed."
The Office of Public Prosecution will consider whether to ask the government to tighten the law.

Chance meeting ends in death


Anthony Dowsley
Herald Sun November 01, 2009 11:27PM


SAMANTHA Saul had only hours to live when she met Mark Shannon at a Crown casino nightclub.
SAMANTHA Saul had only hours to live when she met Mark Shannon at a Crown casino nightclub.
It was a midweek night in August 2005 when the two met at Odeon, and clicked, but then went separate ways.
Shannon and his friend, Tim Allen, had been drinking at a Hawthorn nightclub before going to the casino and, after a few more drinks there, planned to head back to Hawthorn.
But another chance meeting at a nearby McDonald's sealed their fates.
Ms Saul and her friend, David Clarke, piled into Shannon's four-wheel drive to head back to Cheers in Hawthorn.
But after driving just 1km Shannon ran a red light and at twice the speed limit, causing a horrific crash with another car.
Ms Saul, a former exotic dancer who had come to Melbourne from Queensland for a change of scene, had been having trouble with her seatbelt as they hurtled towards the accident.
She was found critically injured and lying beneath the driver's seat of the mangled car at the corner of Flinders and King streets.
Shannon, a chef, was taken to the Royal Melbourne Hospital with serious injuries, where his blood was extracted.
Three samples were taken, two of them for police to analyse and another for Shannon.
His blood showed he had an alcohol content reading of .119, more than twice the legal limit.
Twenty six-year-old Ms Saul's battle for life ended 17 days later in The Alfred hospital when her parents, Barb and John, made the excruciating decision to turn off her life support.
In 2006 Shannon was charged with culpable driving causing death.
Three years later he was sentenced after pleading guilty to the lesser charge of dangerous driving causing death.
He also admitted two counts of negligently causing serious injury.
He was sentenced to a maximum four years' jail, with a two-year minimum.
During his plea hearing the court heard he was a "reluctant driver" who was remorseful.
But it also heard in the years following the incident Shannon received four penalty notices for his poor driving.
He came under demerit point pressure after failing to stop at a stop sign and had also been nabbed for three speeding offences.
Ms Saul's mother's victim impact statement, which was not heard by the court for legal reasons, told of her devastation.
In part, it read: "One never expects to lose a child, it only happens to other people. I have only met two of my blood relatives. I gave birth to both, and I hope to God I don't have to bury both. I don't know that I could survive it a second time."
Ms Saul's friend, Mr Clarke, suffered acquired brain injury and ongoing problems with his back from the accident. He is not expected to make a full recovery.

Driver jailed over passenger death


AAP October 29, 2009 6:43PM

A SPEEDING Melbourne driver who killed his passenger when he ran through a red light and slammed into another car has been jailed for four years.
Mark Donald Shannon, 30, was travelling at more than double the 40km/h speed limit in a Flinders Street roadworks zone in central Melbourne on August 24, 2005, when he crashed.
One of his passengers, Samantha Saul, was critically injured and died several weeks later when her life-support system was turned off in hospital.
Two other passengers - Tim Allen and David Clarke - were seriously injured.
The Victorian County Court heard that Shannon and his passengers had been at Crown Casino and were driving to a nightclub when the crash occurred at about 3.45am.
Judge Stuart Campbell noted Shannon was driving at 84km/h in the 40km/h zone and road conditions and visibility at the time were described as poor.
After speeding through the light he slammed into another car and then into a temporary traffic barrier.
"This was an extraordinarily high speed to be travelling in the vicinity of these roadworks, let alone in the city," Judge Campbell said.
"How did you come to drive in this manner and be responsible for so much misery?"
Judge Campbell noted Shannon had drunk alcohol on the night of the crash but evidence regarding his blood alcohol reading was ruled inadmissible.
Shannon pleaded guilty to dangerous driving causing death and two counts of negligently causing serious injury.
The court heard Shannon had only met Ms Saul and Mr Clarke on the night of the crash.
The pair agreed to go in Shannon's car to another nightclub.
Shannon was remorseful and had accepted responsibility for his actions, the court heard.
Judge Campbell said he was legally bound to sentence Shannon under old legislation that had a five-year maximum sentence for dangerous driving causing death.
The penalty has since increased to 10 years.
Shannon, of Murrumbeena in Melbourne's southeast, must serve two years prison before being eligible for parole.
He was also disqualified from driving for three years.